Stop securing credentials.
Eliminate them.
One cryptographic rail. Every channel. Native MFA by construction.
Your IdP stays. Your codebase stays. The static credentials don't. AI agents authenticate cryptographically instead of holding API keys. Helpdesk and voice verify cryptographically instead of asking for the last four. One ceremony, multiple factors. Production-ready in 14 days.
No API keys, no service-to-service tokens, no embedded secrets. Every connection is cryptographically signed, ephemeral, and scoped to a specific action.
Multi-factor by construction. One user action, multiple cryptographic factors verified. No layered MFA service. No code to enter. No push to approve.
Static keys at agent scale guarantee a breach. ScrambleID is the cryptographic substrate AI deployment requires, not a nice-to-have.
Your IdP stays. Your codebase stays. Configuration, not code. The cryptographic rail layers on top of what you have. 14 days to production.
Credentials, gone. Cryptography, in their place.
Every modern breach has a credential at the root. Stolen API keys, leaked session tokens, social-engineered passwords, embedded secrets in code, vault keys that themselves leak. The ScrambleID rail eliminates the static credential as a primitive. Every connection across your stack becomes a cryptographic proof: ephemeral, scoped, verifiable, revocable. The IdP stays where it is. The codebase stays where it is. The credentials stop existing.
Today
Every connection carries a static credential. Every credential is a latent breach. The IdP, the codebase, and the team can't make this go away.
With ScrambleID
The same architecture. The cryptographic rail underneath. Static credentials don't exist. The IdP stays. The codebase stays.
Breach evidence is overwhelming. Adoption isn't.
The credential-driven breach pattern is now industrial. Verizon DBIR consistently identifies stolen credentials as the single largest attack vector across years of data. The incidents are a who's-who of the last five years: a CI vendor, a PaaS platform, a rideshare giant, a password manager, an identity provider, two casino giants, a consumer genetics service, a hyperscaler. You know every one of them. The line is rising. The line that should answer it (enterprise deployment of cryptographic identity across non-web channels) is flat.
Every breach above is publicly disclosed. The root cause column is the same word on every row on purpose.
The credential is the breach. Every. Single. Time. Eliminate the credential. The breach class goes with it.
Every AI promise on your roadmap is gated by an identity primitive.
Six AI initiatives. Six identity gates. The promise lives on a board slide. The reality is "forgot password," "security questions," "hardcoded credentials," "shared API keys." The blocker isn't AI. It's what you authenticate with. One cryptographic substrate eliminates all six gates.
Intelligent Digital Experience
gated by
forgot password?
AI-Powered Customer Support
gated by
security questions
AI Agent Deployment
gated by
hardcoded credentials
AI-Powered Workforce
gated by
password expired
End-to-End Agentic Workflows
gated by
enter MFA code
AI-Native Partner Ecosystem
gated by
shared API keys
The AI transformation you're being asked to lead doesn't get blocked by AI. It gets blocked by what you authenticate with.
One file. Fourteen days.
The full integration surface is a single configuration file. Your codebase doesn't migrate. Your IdP stays. The SDK isn't a heavy import. You write the config, point it at your existing IdP, name the channels you want verified, and ship. From day zero to production in two weeks.
# The full integration. Everything else stays. tenant_id: ${SCRAMBLEID_TENANT_ID} # Your existing IdP. Unchanged. Source of truth.identity_provider: vendor: okta # or entra, ping, forgerock tenant: ${OKTA_TENANT} connection_mode: federate # we read attributes, we don't write # Channels where cryptographic verification runs.channels: - voice - web - frontline - agent # AI agents and chatbots - people # helpdesk and human agent deployment_mode: overlay # never replace the IdPYour codebase doesn't migrate. Your IdP doesn't move. You add one file. Two weeks later you're verified across every channel.
What CTOs benchmark. Where ScrambleID lands.
Passwordless and cryptographic auth is a crowded category. The honest comparison: ScrambleID matches the leaders on FIDO2-grade web and mobile authentication, and lands ahead on the things that actually decide an architecture for a 2026 enterprise. Voice. Helpdesk. AI agent authentication. Deployment as an overlay rather than a system replacement. Production-ready timeline measured in days, not quarters.
Swipe sideways to compare. ScrambleID is the highlighted column.
| Capability | ScrambleID | Beyond Identity | HYPR | Stytch | Okta FastPass | Duo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eliminates static credentials | - | |||||
| Native MFA by construction | - | |||||
| Voice channel verification | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Helpdesk identity verification | - | - | - | - | - | |
| AI agent authentication* | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Overlay deployment (no IdP swap) | - | n/a | ||||
| Configuration, not code | - | |||||
| 14-day production timeline | - | - | ||||
| Works with existing IdP | - | n/a | ||||
| AAL3 aligned (NIST SP 800-63-4) |
*AI agent authentication: the cryptographic primitive supports it by construction. Productized agent surface is in active roadmap. See FAQ for the honest status.
Web and mobile passwordless is table stakes now. The differentiation is everywhere else.
Architects' questions. Honest answers.
Ten questions a CTO or security architect doing diligence will ask. Where the answer requires a caveat, the caveat is in.
How does this work with our existing IdP?
ScrambleID is the cryptographic verification layer on top of your IdP. Your IdP stays the source of truth for identity, group membership, and policy. ScrambleID handles the cryptographic ceremony at every channel and references your IdP for the attributes it needs. Works with Okta, Microsoft Entra, Ping Identity, ForgeRock, and any OIDC- or SAML-compliant provider. No user migration. No data sync. The IdP stays put.
What's the actual integration scope?
A configuration file in your application, a connector in your IdP, and channel-by-channel rollout. The codebase doesn't migrate. The SDK isn't a heavy import. Production-ready in 14 days end to end, including dev validation, staging rollout, canary, and cutover. See the deployment cadence above.
How does AI agent authentication actually work?
The same cryptographic primitive that secures voice, web, and helpdesk extends naturally to AI agents: a scoped proof tied to the user's specific intent, not a static API key. The proof is ephemeral (good for the specific action authorized), scoped (limited in what it can do), and audit-traceable (the log shows which user's intent the agent acted on). Static keys never enter the agent's environment. The architecture supports this by construction; the productized agent surface is on the active roadmap. Speak with us about your specific deployment.
What's the failure mode if ScrambleID is unavailable?
The cryptographic verification layer is designed with your IdP as the system-of-record, so the IdP's existing auth flow remains the fallback if the rail is unavailable. The application doesn't break. The auth path degrades to the legacy posture (passwords plus whatever MFA you already have on the IdP side). Operational specifics, uptime targets, redundancy posture, and incident response procedures are documented in the commercial contract.
AAL3 alignment, FIDO2 compliance. What can we claim?
ScrambleID's cryptographic ceremony is AAL3-aligned per NIST SP 800-63-4. We don't claim formal AAL3 certification from a third-party lab because that process is for end-to-end systems and depends on your full configuration. We provide an AAL3-aligned implementation and the documentation your auditors need. On FIDO2 and WebAuthn, we use the spec but don't claim formal FIDO Alliance certification we haven't earned. The honest line is "aligned and compliant," not "certified."
Helpdesk verification. What does this look like in practice?
The helpdesk agent triggers verification from their console. The customer completes the cryptographic ceremony on their registered device. The agent's view updates with the verified status. No security questions. No "last four." The verification is cryptographic, tied to the user's identity of record, and auditable. The playbook that shut down a casino giant fails because verbal claims of identity stop being the path through.
Voice channel. How is this not just voice biometrics again?
ScrambleID doesn't do voice biometrics. The voice channel uses cryptographic verification: the IVR announces a short code, the caller enters it on their device (which holds the cryptographic key), the device sends the proof to the rail, the rail verifies and signals the caller is who they claim to be. The caller's voice is not analyzed. AI voice cloning has zero attack surface here because nothing about the voice is verifying anything.
How does this work in our compliance environment (PCI, SOC 2, FedRAMP)?
ScrambleID maintains SOC 2 Type II. On PCI, ScrambleID does not process cardholder data; identity verification sits adjacent to your PCI scope. NIST SP 800-63-4 AAL3 alignment is core. On FedRAMP, the posture and roadmap are available under NDA. We're transparent about what we hold and what we don't; auditors prefer it that way.
What's the workforce vs customer identity story?
ScrambleID works for both. For workforce identity (your employees authenticating to internal systems), the rail rides on top of your workforce IdP (Okta, Microsoft Entra, Ping, ForgeRock). For customer identity (your end users authenticating to your product), the rail rides on top of your CIAM (Okta CIC, Microsoft Entra External, Auth0, your custom CIAM). The cryptographic ceremony is the same. The IdP reference is the difference.
What if we want to leave? What's the migration story off ScrambleID?
Your IdP, your codebase, and your user enrollment data are exactly as they were. The cryptographic verification layer goes away. Your auth reverts to the IdP's native flow. The only thing you lose is the cryptographic verification at non-web channels (voice, helpdesk, AI agent) and the elimination of static credentials. Nothing locks you in. The "reversibility" property is part of why the deployment timeline is days and not quarters.
The diligence questions stay the same. The honest answers change the conversation.
The same primitive extends past auth. Over any consequential action an agent takes, three gates and one signed chain from intent to execution, on the rail you already integrate.
See how the rail gates an actionYour agents will outrun token rotation.
A per-request signature never needs rotating.
Architecture review on the calendar. Production on day fourteen.